Geena Davis is not
only an advocate for gender equality in media, but an actress that has starred
in many films with strong, female leads (Thelma and Louise, and A League of
their Own to name a couple). On May 5, 2012 she stood in front of the Women’s
Funding Network and gave her speech, “Reshaping the Media for Gender Equality.”
This speech was analyzed using a Neo-Aristotelian approach; and in this I found
that invention was the bulk of her speech. Invention is made up of three
artistic proofs: Ethos, is the credibility of the speaker, Logos is the logic
behind a speech, and pathos is the emotion behind the message. Geena
establishes credibility by mentioning her own institution, “The Geena Davis
Institute on Gender in Media” which is solely dedicated to this particular
subject. She exploits her past roles (both the flattering and not so
flattering) as examples of how women can influence and how they can be
objectified, also she uses this as a way to reaffirm her credibility on this
subject. Geena refers to herself several times as a “data-head” as she spits
out statistics left and right. By using statistics from research she funded to
make the correlation between gender roles in “G” rated films and eventually achieving
parity, Geena used statistics to represent logos. In an effort to reach her
audience emotionally, Geena tells a personal story about how playing as a
child, she would always have more of an interest in the more masculine roles
because there were never any feminine roles that expanded her horizon on what
was available to her.
As for the delivery
of her speech, Geena was organized in a manner that made the main points
obvious to the audience. She would reiterate points for emphasis such as, “boys
and girls need to share the sandbox equally.” Genna used simple and plain
language, and was engaging; her tone was a nice medium between formal and
conversational. She maintained eye-contact and kept a stern and consistent tone
to her voice and only used hand gestures to emphasis specific points. Davis
used hand gestures to elaborate on her claim that limited roles for women in
film shows society that limited roles for women in other sectors is perceived
as “normal.” It is important to note that she repeats the word normal several
times. By doing this, she is creating a negative connotation with the word in
the context of this speech. She has strategic pauses and ends with an
influential quote from Martin Luther King Jr. referring to everyone as an
“agent of change”, an effective tactic for energizing and leaving a lasting
impression on an audience.
Solid! (but maybe don't refer to her by her first name)
ReplyDelete